TheRadioBoard

Forum for the homemade radio builder. Newbies and Experts and everyone else are welcome here!
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 1:09 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:12 pm
Posts: 1021
Using a noise bridge to tune an antenna is done, I believe, by setting the bridge for 50 ohms resistance and 0 ohms reactance, then tuning the antenna (e.g. adjusting an antenna tuner, or trimming a dipole) until a noise null is achieved.

However in the case of a small loop antenna, tuning the antenna's capacitor for resonance will greatly peak the noise that the receiver hears from the antenna.

It seems that these effects may work against each other, i.e., as you are adjusting the antenna closer to resonance (resistive impedance) and trying to reduce the noise from the bridge's noise source, at the same time the noise from the antenna is coming up as you approach resonance, which may mask the noise source's noise and make finding the null difficult.

Is it workable to use a noise bridge to tune a loop antenna?

I don't have a noise bridge, but was planning on building one for the express purpose of tuning my loop antenna.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 2525
Location: South Florida
It's a tedious process, which is why you don't see noise bridges around much anymore. Devices like the MFJ antenna analyzer (Comet and others make them as well) are easier to use because they generate a signal and display the load reactance and, on some analyzers, its sign. For the loop, I'd adjust for max band noise, then use the transmitter and its SWR meter at low power, to get the final match.

73,

_________________
Image
http://kr1s.kearman.com/
http://qrp.kearman.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:12 pm
Posts: 1021
OK, well even if the loop antenna is most easily tuned by peaking the band noise, I'd still like to build a noise bridge nonetheless. It seems like an interesting instrument. It occurred to me that I could use a noise bridge to answer my previous question about transmission line impedance mismatches: null the bridge with a 50-ohm resistor connected directly to the bridge, then do the same thing with the resistor connected at the end of a run of 50-ohm coax, then do the same thing after adding a short 75-ohm run of coax and the RCA cable adapters, and see how the impedance changes in each case.

As for using the noise bridge with the loop antenna, I found some noise bridge designs that modulate the noise generator noise to make it more distinguishable from band noise. Perhaps that might help in tuning up a loop antenna near resonance.

Though it might not be that important for practical tune-up (where, as you say, you can use the rig's SWR meter), I'd really like to get some confirmation that my antenna is somewhere near 50 ohms before letting my transmitter touch the antenna. Also I like the idea of tuning up without causing QRM, however brief.


Last edited by qrp-gaijin on Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 2525
Location: South Florida
qrp-gaijin wrote:
Though it might not be that important for practical tune-up (where, as you say, you can use the rig's SWR meter), I'd really like to get some confirmation that my antenna is somewhere near 50 ohms before letting my transmitter touch the antenna. Also I like the idea of tuning up without causing QRM, however brief.

Modern transmitters have high-VSWR-foldback circuits that reduce drive proportionally to SWR. What will kill a solid-state rig is overtemperature, which can be caused by endless twiddling trying to achieve perfect 1:1 SWR at too-high power levels. PA modules have built-in temperature sensors, but modern rigs generally have inadequate heat sinks, to save weight and cost. The PA transistors may sacrifice themselves to save the sensors. AM rigs were designed for 100% duty cycle. Not so the rigs of today.

Believe me, with that antenna, the few tens of mW needed to measure SWR aren't going to cause QRM! :( But if you can find the components, by all means build a noise bridge. They're fun to play with.

73,

_________________
Image
http://kr1s.kearman.com/
http://qrp.kearman.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 123
Quote:
Modern transmitters have high-VSWR-foldback circuits that reduce drive proportionally to SWR.

That probably explains Mike Underwood's claims about excess magnetic loop antenna efficiency. He is maybe only putting 10 Watts into a given loop antenna but thinks he is putting in 100 Watts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 2525
Location: South Florida
seanvn wrote:
Quote:
Modern transmitters have high-VSWR-foldback circuits that reduce drive proportionally to SWR.

That probably explains Mike Underwood's claims about excess magnetic loop antenna efficiency. He is maybe only putting 10 Watts into a given loop antenna but thinks he is putting in 100 Watts.

Modern rigs usually have power and SWR metering built in. Qrp-gaijin's rig is tiny so its meter isn't large enough to read anything but relative SWR and power. A 100-W transceiver should tell the operator what's really going on. I'll agree though, that the efficiency numbers for small loops seem optimistic at times!

73,

_________________
Image
http://kr1s.kearman.com/
http://qrp.kearman.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:12 pm
Posts: 1021
seanvn wrote:
That probably explains Mike Underwood's claims about excess magnetic loop antenna efficiency. He is maybe only putting 10 Watts into a given loop antenna but thinks he is putting in 100 Watts.

While we're on the subject of small transmitting loop antennas: if I am not mistaken, you earlier proposed a two-turn foil loop on another group:
http://dir.groups.yahoo.com/group/loopa ... ssage/7445

If you have done experiments in this area, do you have any results you could share? Did you try a two-turn strip loop?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group